
Research
supporting the Orton-Gillingham approach Back
to Top
Research
shows that 95% of reading failure is preventable — by using
appropriate reading systems and well-trained teachers.
Dr. Orton
and Anna Gillingham developed a unique
method and sequence to significantly improve the reading and
spelling skills of children and adults with dyslexia way back
in the 1930's.
The Barton
Reading & Spelling System is an Orton-Gillingham influenced
approach to reading and spelling. It is one of ten
well-known Orton-Gillingham based systems.
All the latest
scientific, independent, replicated reading research supports
the Orton-Gillingham sequence and methodology as “best practices”
when teaching reading to students with dyslexia. This is the approach recommended by the International Dyslexia Association. To view their Fact Sheets on Orton-Gillingham, click here for Fact Sheet #1, and click here for Fact Sheet #2.
So if your
child has dyslexia and has qualified for Special Education services,
this description of a reading program should be written into his
or her I.E.P.:
Independent
scientific replicated research supports as "best practices"
the use of a reading system that is simultaneously multisensory,
systematic, and cumulative with direct and explicit instruction
in both synthetic and analytic phonics—to show how reading
and spelling are related—with intense practice for a child
with dyslexia.
Yet most
teachers, reading specialists, and resource specialists have NOT
been trained in any Orton-Gillingham-based system.
That's why
most parents have to hire
a tutor who is certified in an Orton-Gillingham System.
Here are
links to some of that research:
- •
A
Scientific Approach to Reading Instruction
- by Barbara
Foorman, Jack Fletcher, and David Francis
- •
Teaching
Reading is Rocket Science:
- What expert
teachers of reading should know and be able to do
by Louisa Moats
- •
Preventing
Reading Difficulties in Young Children
- Learning
First Alliance Report
•
National Right to
Read Foundation
- •
Put
Reading First
The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children
to Read
- The National
Reading Panel issued a report in 2000 that responded to a Congressional
mandate to help parents, teachers, and policymakers identify
key skills and methods central to reading achievement.
The Panel's
task was to review research in reading instruction (focusing
on the critical years of kindergarten through third grade)
and identify those methods that consistently lead to reading
success.
This
free Put Reading First booklet is a parent-friendly summary
of their results.
•
National
Reading Panel – Entire Report
- •
New York Times Article
- Peter
Wright is now one of the top education-rights lawyers in this
nation. His most famous victory was the landmark 1993 Supreme
Court Case Florence County School District Four vs. Carter.
which extended the rights of LD children to go to private school
at public expense after their public school has failed to educate
them.
To read
the rest of this New York Times article, click
here.
- •
Summary of NIH Reading Research
by G. Reid Lyon
- Director
of Research Programs in Reading Development and Disorders, Learning
Disabilities, Language Development and Disorders, and Cognitive
Neuroscience. Also Chief of the Child Development and Behavior
Branch at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
(NICHD) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
www.schwablearning.org
select Reading from the Topic list,
click on Lyon: Developing Reading Skills
•
Why
Reading is Not a Natural Process
by G. Reid Lyon
- •
NIH Research Results
- click
here
- Back
to Top
-
-
Early
Intervention Research Back
to Top
A
Summary of the Research
Research
on the long-term consequences of early reading difficulty provides
an incentive for early intervention. Juel (1988) found that
students who are poor readers in first grade are almost certain
to remain poor readers at the end of fourth grade. Cunningham
and Stanovich (1997) found that first-grade reading achievement
strongly predicts 11th-grade reading achievement.
Other researchers
have shown that students at risk for reading failure can be
identified early, using tests of phonological awareness, and
treated successfully with intensive, explicit instruction in
phonological awareness, followed by systematic phonics instruction.
Early intervention
for reading problems reduces the number of students identified
as learning disabled (Dickson & Bursuck, 1999; Jenkins &
O'Connor, O'Connor 2000).
One-on-one
tutoring is the gold standard for reading instruction, and the
benefits of that type of tutoring is supported by research (Cohen,
Kulik, & Kulik, 1982; Juel, 1996; Waskik, 1998; Wasik &
Slavin, 1993).
That's
why the No Child Left Behind Act includes a mandate
that failing schools make one-on-one tutoring available for
their students.
Yet most
schools do not have enough trained personnel available to offer
one-on-one tutoring.
Innovative
schools are using the Barton Reading & Spelling System to
train volunteer tutors for their Early
Intervention Programs—and are getting very impressive
results.
- American
Educational Research Associates
- Researchers
Support Early Intervention for ALL Children
Who Experience Difficulty Learning to Read
- Catch
Them Before They Fall
- by Joseph
Torgeson
Identification and Assessment to Prevent Reading Failure in
Young Children
- No Child Left Behind Act
- The
No Child Left Behind Act is an attempt to force schools to
use research-based methods to teach reading, and to hold schools
accountable for their student's reading scores. To learn more
about this important act, click
here.
The
No Child Left Behind Act also requires low-performing schools
to provide one-on-one tutoring. The Barton Reading &
Spelling System is an ideal way to meet that requirement.
To read more about that requirement, click
here.
Back
to Top
Research
on the Barton Reading & Spelling System Back
to Top
The
Barton Reading & Spelling System was released in June of
1999.
Here are the independent research reports that have been published and/or received to date.
Florida Center for Reading Research The mission of the Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR) is:
- To conduct basic research on reading, reading growth, reading assessment, and reading instruction that will contribute to the scientific knowledge of reading and benefit students in Florida and throughout the nation
- To disseminate information about research-based practices related to literacy instruction and assessment for children in pre-school through 12th grade.
- To conduct applied research that will have an immediate impact on policy and practices related to literacy instruction in Florida.
- To provide technical assistance to Florida's schools and to the State Department of Education for the improvement of literacy outcomes in students from pre-K through 12th grade.
Florida Center for Reading Research recently published a glowing report on the Barton Reading & Spelling System on their website. To read their report, go to: www.BartonReading.com/FCRR.pdf
Arkansas RTI Study
The Benton School District in Arkansas implemented an early intervention, Response To Intervention (RTI) program in all four of their elementary schools. They screened their kindergarten and first grade students using Dibels to identify students at risk of reading failure -- and used Dibels to monitor the success of each type of intervention.
The Barton Reading & Spelling System was used as Tier 3 Intervention for students in the highest risk category. Groups of no more than 3 students received Barton tutoring at least 3 times a week for 30 minutes per session.
To view the spectacular results of this study, go to: www.BartonReading.com/AR-RTIStudy.pdf
Florida Dyslexia Study - more than 2 years gain in 40 weeks
Independent research conducted in Florida at two different Speech-Language clinics showed more than 2 years of gain in decoding and reading comprehension, and more than 1.5 years of gain in fluency, after 40 weeks of one-on-one Barton tutoring.
All of the participants had documented reading deficits due to dyslexia. They ranged from first graders to sixth graders. 52% of the children came from households below the poverty level.37% attended public school, 31.5% attended private school, and 31.5% were homeschooled.
Students were pre and post tested using the Phonetic Reading Test (PRT).
To read the study, and their impressive results, go to:
www.dys-add.com/FloridaCampbellStudy.pdf
West Virginia Special Education Study
Although this study only included 6 special education students who were classified as Learning Disabled, it tracked those students over two years. The first year they did not receive Barton tutoring. The second year they received two 45-minute one-on-one tutoring sessions per week.
Their growth, per their results on the state standards tests, are as follows:
| Grade at end of study |
Year ending |
Gains in Grade Equivalents |
Gains in Independent Reading Level |
Year End
Grade Equivalent |
Student A 4th Grade |
06-2006
06-2007 |
0.2
0.8 |
1.1
1.0 |
|
Student B
5th Grade
|
06-2006
06-2007 |
0.2
2.8 |
0.9
5.0 |
|
Student C
5th Grade
|
06-2006
06-2007 |
0.4
1.6 |
0.8
2.3 |
|
Student D
6th Grade
|
06-2006
06-2007 |
0.0
2.5 |
-0.1
3.4 |
|
Student E
5th Grade
|
06-2006
06-2007 |
1.2
2.4 |
1.4
2.1 |
|
Student F
4th Grade |
06-2006
06-2007 |
0.2
2.3 |
0.6
2.6 |
|
Christine Taylor-Redmond
Mineral Wells Elementary
Mineral Wells, WV
Texas TAKS Study
Three years ago, we started using the Barton Reading & Spelling System in a small way in our district. We had 7 students who had not been able to pass the TAKS end-of-year statewide standards test. They flunked it all 3 times they were allowed to take it.
After only 9 months of one-on-one Barton tutoring for 45 minutes a day, all 7 students passed the TAKS test -- 2 with commendations, and 2 with perfect scores.
Last year, we expanded our use of the Barton System to the 55 students identified with dyslexia in grades 3, 4, 5, and 6. At the end of those grades, 53 of the 55 passed the TAKS test the first time they took it. (The 2 students who did not pass started Barton tutoring very late in the school year.)
That's why this year, we will be using the Barton Reading & Spelling System with struggling students in every school in our district.
Ernie Maldanado, Dyslexia Specialist
Weslaco School District
Weslaco, TX
Alaska Dyslexia Study - 2 years gain in 6 months
As part of a multi-year grant, four school districts in Alaska are testing students for dyslexia, then providing those students with one-on-one tutoring using the Barton Reading & Spelling System.
In early October, 45 of those students from grades 2 through 11 were given Form A of the GORT to establish "before" scores. Students in the elementary grades were then given 2 to 3 hours of one-on-one Barton tutoring per week. Middle and high school students received 5 hours per week. Those same 45 students were given form B of the GORT 6 months later, in April, to measure their progress.Their average growth rate was 2 years -- in just 6 months of Barton tutoring. To view their before-and-after data, click here. Camille Booth, the director of the STRIVE Dyslexia Program shared that her program is now serving 140 students in four public school districts in or near Craig, Alaska.
To view the data from the study and details of the STRIVE Dyslexia Program, go to: www.bartonreading.com/AlaskaData.pdf
Florida Early Intervention Study
Discovery Elementary School in Palm Beach, Florida, screened all first graders in January using DIBELS. They took the 20 lowest-scoring at-highest-risk students and provided 3 months of small-group instruction using the Barton Reading & Spelling System. In April, after just 3 months of intervention, 17 of the 20 students scores were above the DIBELS benchmark in Nonsense Word Fluency, which tests the ability to read by sounding out.
Their before-after scores were:
Student |
NWF Before |
NWF After |
% increase |
A |
21 |
124 |
490 % |
B |
23 |
44 |
91 % |
C |
0, No Score |
42 |
|
D |
50 |
56 |
12 % |
E |
2 |
38 |
1800 % |
F |
0, No Score |
40 |
|
G |
47 |
53 |
13 % |
H |
23 |
71 |
209 % |
I |
19 |
40 |
111 % |
J |
36 |
49 |
36 % |
K |
31 |
71 |
129 % |
L |
22 |
28 |
26 % |
M |
30 |
66 |
120 % |
N |
18 |
46 |
156 % |
O |
26 |
37 |
42 % |
P |
28 |
70 |
150 % |
Q |
40 |
33 |
-18 % |
R |
36 |
57 |
58 % |
S |
19 |
56 |
195 % |
T |
26 |
37 |
42 % |
Now that I have data to show such incredible improvement, my principal has agreed to allow K-2 intervention using the Barton Reading & Spelling System to take place all year long this coming school year.
Sue Hoyt
Discover Elementary School
Palm Beach, FL
California Early Intervention Study
This study was written up as an independent
scientific journal article, which has been submitted for publication
in a peer-reviewed journal. It shows statistically significant
gains in phonemic awareness, rapid naming, and phonological memory
after only 5 months of twice-a-week tutoring using the Barton
System. To read this article, click
here.
Pleasanton (CA) USD Volunteer Tutors Study
To view the gains made by volunteer tutors using the Barton System in the Pleasanton Unified School District, watch the presentation they recently made to the California School Board Association, click here.
Here's a 3-minute You-Tube video from Christina Clark, their Barton Facilitator, explaining their program and sharing their before-and-after research data.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGPu-fCzg_g
here is a 3-minute You-Tube video from a student who did not get the right type of help until high school -- and the difference it made. www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfF-CxX9fdA
By the way, that student just graduated and joined the Marines. He scored so high on their aptitude test that they put him straight into Aeronautical Engineering.
Data from Juvenile Corrections and Private LD Schools
To view this unsolicited independent before-after data from five unusual school sites, ranging from Byron's Boys Ranch (a juvenile correction facility) to a private school for students with learning disabilities, click here.
As
more research articles are written, we will post them.
Back
to Top
Barton
System Approved by California Department of Education
Back to Top
On
May 1, 2003, the Barton Reading & Spelling System was approved
by the California Department of Education.
These
materials have now been added to the Instructional Materials Approved
for Legal Compliance website. Click here to see that on the California Department of Education website.
So
public schools in California can purchase the Barton System using
textbook funds.
What
Won't Work Back
to Top
Most
parents have tried one or more of the following products or treatments,
and know they do NOT work for children with dyslexia.
• Hooked
on Phonics or The Phonics Game
•
Reading Recovery
• Vision Therapy
• Fast ForWord
• Brain Gym or other neurodevelopmental exercises
• Special glasses
• Medicine
• Special diets
• Accelerated Reader
• Most commercial learning center chains, such as
Sylvan,
Kuman and Score
For research
proving these methods don't work, buy the Summer 2001 issue of
Perspectives, from the International Dyslexia Association by calling
800-ABCD-123
If you want
feedback on any OTHER methods you may have heard about, feel free
to ask by clicking
here.
|